Is community college free if you get a Pell Grant? At least, that's what some people believe. It would be a benefit for society for everyone to be able to get a college education for free. If college was free more people would be able to and want to go to college. If students should pay for the university education, that may be dissuade them. By students going to college and obtaining a college degree open doors for graduates to earn a higher salary… 879 Words 4 Pages I argue that college education should not be free. People have a deep conviction about this controversy. The strongest argument in favour of tuition fees is that university graduates have subststantially higher incomes than non-university graduates.
For that reason, it's valuable to look at ways both provincial governments and the federal government could institute free tuition: there are multiple ways this could be implemented, meaning even if some provinces are as cash-strapped as they say, free tuition is by no means a lost cause. Maybe some kind of middle ground exists. It means figuring out implicit rules-rules that can change. State budgets could become strained, which might lead to cuts and decreased access to the programs that students want to take. Most of those students are really smart and can go somewhere in life, but they end up working for a minimum wage because a university education is just too much for them.
Education should be free because some people can have a very good future and they can get many scholarships but not all of them would pay for school. But the problem is not just that college is expensive. But this question deserves a lot more than a simple yes or no answer. So graduation numbers might drop, or the people who do graduate might not be as well prepared for the workforce. All we are to the big businesses of the world is collateral damage.
Opponents of the Quebec student movement also claim that the participation rate of less wealthy students is no different in high tuition fee jurisidictions than in Quebec. . They can charge whatever they want for room and board because that would be optional. Socially, a more educated population should have more choices regarding nutrition, jobs and lifestyle. To begin with, when universities are offered for free, that will increase the equality of opportunities. There are many financial aid forms, like grants and loans, available which will help students afford college.
But wait, where will the student flourish? University should be free for everyone and that will make a big change to the world. Researches have shown that countries who offer free higher education have the great rate of innovations and develop faster. Furthermore, in a free market, higher education would become the preserve of wealthy families who can afford to send their children to university. Many students who are in higher education are also being discouraged because of the low job opportunities after they graduate from… 1689 Words 7 Pages Higher education at state colleges and universities should be free for all American citizens. However, the cost of living in Norway is much higher than most other countries to cover the costs of free university tuition, as well as other social services. Furthermore, charging to study at university will increase inequality of opportunity as students with low-income parents will be more likely to be deterred from going to university. Issue 1: Not everyone wants to go to college.
The most famous learning association is the university. But Finland, Norway, and Germany only spend 2. In many states students must pay fees to attend university, for which they may seek student loans or grants. And if your income stayed low, you would have the peace of mind of knowing that your loan obligations would eventually expire. The prospect of making college education completely free for all students is one that could carry many obvious benefits. In fact, only 18% of the freshmen class comes from the five New York boroughs. I would rephrase the question so as to ask not who is the someone who should pay, but what sectors of human activity should be funded by the collectivity because they serve the collective good or constitute protection against collective risk? In Europe as well as many other places around the world college is free which allows all sorts of kids to attend.
The reality is that concepts of social justice are terrifying to the wealthy because they falsely perceive these precepts inherently usher in liberal edicts of wealth redistribution. Another issue is how do you charge students for going to university? It's called mass and free education. If students have to pay for university education, this may dissuade them. To me, it is nothing less than a human right. Almost as original as discovering that hot water is hot.
They are able to do this by cancelling their previous educational tax credit programs, and re-allocating that money into these new government education grants. The quality of education would also suffer if university education is free. An even less convincing argument for costly university tuition is that students and graduates do not value their studies unless they are expensive. Community colleges offer degree studies for a fraction of the cost in comparison to certain institutions. So when governments support universities financially. Are these college students really entitled to free higher education? But the legislation would only cover tuition and fees, not books, room and board, or other expenses.
And that, they say, could hurt the economy since people might have less to spend or invest. For example, consider the possibility of an income-based repayment system. But a Pell Grant only covered about 60 percent of the cost of attending community college in 2013. Oh no, that takes things too far. You have to think of all the possible problems that could arise with free college. Some people will not be able to afford to have children. As a result, Americans may have to start paying much higher taxes.
In the 2012-2013 school year, that represented over 70 percent of all student financial assistance in the higher education sector. With education comes evolution of thought, behavior and lifestyle. And happier people could lead to a happier, more prosperous nation as a whole. Now, if college had a swinging door, then it could potentially become a continued annoyance just like high school was. For that reason, a university education should be free for all students who graduate… 933 Words 4 Pages have to attend a higher education school.