These men believed in a republican form of government that was ran by property holders. I believe that both Beard and Roche were against a democratic government because they were afraid to have uneducated men having a major say in the government, but they were also afraid of monarchy. He just asserts the fact that most Revolutionists were poor and pure of heart, and then applies the fact that most of the Constitutional framers were wealthy. The history of the United States of America might have been very different had these radicals been present at the convention to properly defend the power of the state and local governments. They acted on that anger to declare independence and lead the country through eight years of war to achieve it. Voting unanimously was inefficient and led to the passing of very few bills so majority rule was a favored replacement.
John Jay, a Founding Father of the United States who served the …. Had the document been strictly a reactionary piece of literature full of new ideas, it would not have accurately reflected the political climate before the ratification of the Constitution, and thus becomes useless in an argument regarding motivation. This influenced the framers of the Constitution to expand the powers of the federal government, but because they still feared an overly powerful government, they instilled checks and balances to ensure that no one branch or person would gain too much influence. Be sure to include at least five pieces of information in each box. Well, that's just what I was taught, and maybe I was taught wrong.
Founding father and first presidentGeorge Washington was present as well. He also served on the Board of War until 1780, when he retired to the practice of law. The lack of consistency of interstate commerce impeded traders and commercial investors. The Framers did not make a perfect Constitution, but they did pave the way for what was to come for our nation. Roche also claims that there are no. This left those who already owned Western lands in a predicament since they could not expand their property though they had already put money towards doing so.
They feared giving any power to the majority because they could be easily swayed or cowed by a corrupt influential leader like many had all across the world and throughout time. Roche believed that the men who were pushing for reform did not intend to change the government in order to benefit themselves personally but were concerned about how the everyday people were being affected. Charles Beard attempted to characterize the framers of the Constitution as men who were purely self interested, and thought only of amending the government of the United States to serve their own personal goals of wealth and land. Answer to Question: 3 According to Beard, the delegates of the convention viewed democracy and equality as a dangerous balance. In addition, the framers were elected by the people to represent them when writing the Constitution, and before it was implemented, the Constitution first had to be approved by the people.
If the Framers had been a slightly less elite group, the Constitution would likely have included the right to vote for all white men, instead of leaving suffrage up to the states, which all limited it to white, landowning men. Without a change, it would not be too far-fetched to imagine that the United States may very well have been taken over by another established country or the government could have been picked up from the ashes and rebuilt modeling a style proven to have worked in the past, such as a monarchy. In fact, Beard believes that is the most important reason the Framers create the Constitution. Roche argues that the fact that even the most disagreeable states stayed at the convention illustrates that the men truly intended to reform the Constitution. This aroused the need for a legislation for equal opportunity for both sex's to be passed in 1975. Please note that this sample paper on Motivations of the Founding Fathers is for your review only.
John Roche said the Framers of the Constitution were pragmatic democrats, but Charles Beard raised serious doubts about that, labeling them as economic upper-class defenders who feared the aggressive urban mobs and small dirt farmers. Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in Motivations of the Founding Fathers, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Locke lived during the 17th century, and had a prime role in shaping the spirit and language of the United States Constitution. Most importantly, they signed our constition which gave us the rights that we have today. This is seen in the checks and balances on power, as well as the voting process. Roche characterizes the Framers as men who created a Constitution without considering all the options and the potential it could have towards a better democracy.
Robert Morris and Roger Sherman signed all three ofAmericaÃ¢?? A small group of men interested in the good of the country and through their personal experiences led to great changes. The purpose of this new document was to give the government more power over the state governments and to protect the natural rights and freedoms that the country had fought for during the American Revolution. Charles Beard attempted to characterize the delegates of the Constitutional Convention as landowners who wanted the protection of their most valuable asset, property. He calls them remarkable and truly believes that these are the men that should be laying out the rules for the new country. In all, the Constitution was more democratic than undemocratic seen in how the people could indirectly determine what delegates should go to Philadelphia, and also the Constitution, once created, helped to uphold a democratic nation. The group was also made up of a class that had little property holdings and less interest in business and trade, with more interest in agriculture. These legislatures were chosen on by elections in the states; therefore, the people had indirectly voted and sent these delegates to Philadelphia.
Hamilton drafted the resolution that led to the assembling of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. This is a principal thesis of The Gospel of Opposition:. Instead of having biased and opposing state governments vote on the issue, they elected special conventions of delegates from each state to vote on the issue. Although they were intelligent politicians, they largely did not represent the common man and were afraid of the majority becoming too powerful. The Constitution of the United States has been one of the most hotly debated topics in American history since its inception in 1787. Roche argues that the political constraints of the time were not conducive to such a wild and selfish alteration of American government, and the steps that were necessary to send delegates to the Constitutional Convention were far too tedious and numerous to serve this purpose.