Is it fair that in order to obtain a job, some people go through drug testing while drug and alcohol abusers receive free, no strings attached, financial assistance see appendix A? Learn how to help yourself or a loved pursue a healthy life and long, successful career. From that number, 8 people refused to submit for a test, while 12 others failed. Not to mention what they spend on strip clubs, luxury vacations and filet mignons, as one Missouri legislator called out. The industry offers various methods or processes to thwart detection. Last but not least, a lot of people applying for assistance are offended by the assumption that the need for assistance also implies a drug addiction.
Drug tests would ensure that this level of responsible behavior is upheld by those receiving assistance. What type of testing will be done and what will the collection process be?. This group also often says that such an argument is basically telling poor people that they have no right to be happy, or experience the full spectrum of human experience, whereas those not on welfare who are not drug tested at their jobs can do this freely. These social programs include things like nutritional assistance, unemployment, social security, commodities, grants and loans for school, governmentally funded health care, and more. Judges may not have to submit to drug tests, but a lot of us do. Just one state had a usage rate above 1% in this study. Welfare programs are now trying to put into place a new qualification where any possible recipients of welfare are required to take a drug test.
It is a double edged sword because it is the governmental court system and the judges that are not backing the drug testing idea because of the 4 th Amendment. There is a precedent in the job market for drug testing. When applying for a job, almost every job you apply for will require a mandatory drug test before they hire you. Of those, only 2 5. Identifying treatment needs is not the same as providing them. The United States Supreme Court has definitively ruled that urine testing is an intrusion on privacy, both during collection of the sample and when the sample is tested.
Tax payers are obviously working to earn their money, so why should they have to work to pay off the habits of the people who are too lazy to get up and work for it themselves? Why Do Jobs Test for Drug Use? Government leaders and most of the general public are looking at it from a financial point of view while welfare recipients are viewing it from a constitutional point of view. Although some regulations state that the parents would lose their portion, but the child would not, the government is still cutting funds from a family in need. Many states have considered or enacted legislation around this issue. It's clear what's really going on here: some legislators think that poor folks are more likely to abuse drugs -- which is just not true. Even if the program is efficient, economists worry about the high cost of the program, which may even exceed the savings to the budget. On the other hand, over 70% of illegal-drug users between the age 18 and 49 are actually employed full time.
Pre-business sophomore Miles Coleman weighed in on the pros and cons of testing those on welfare, saying that he believes drug testing welfare participants is a good and bad thing. The main premise behind drug testing of welfare applicants is that the state will save money by kicking drug addicts off of welfare and thereby denying them benefits which they will presumably waste on little more than supporting their drug habits. Currently, 15 states have some kind of legislation requiring that welfare recipients be tested for drugs under certain circumstances. Throughout our lives, the vast majority of people are required to take a drug test at one time or another for various reasons, in order to ensure that they are complying with the law. Another blog states: This situation begs the question: if a gainfully employed, well-respected man who pays taxes is required to submit urine for periodic narcotic testing, why does the government not require these same tests for recipients of tax-funded programs? Drug testing is not always foolproof. When households pay taxes each year, they want their government to spend those funds in a way that maximizes the value of their contribution.
The wisdom of this policy is staring us straight in the face: Source: 7. Unfortunately, our government is invested in other affairs, and the wealthy rule over the poor. Why aren't we drug testing the employees of Virginia corporations we give tax credits to? Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences. However, there is a very real cost associated with the personnel time required to administer and interpret those questionnaires, to administer the contract with the testing company, and to follow up with the individuals referred for drug testing. Two weeks later when they fail a drug screen and lose their benefits because of their smoking some weed two weeks ago —everything changes. Now, he goes on welfare.
The question is, should it? Another reason for mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients is that it is fair. Thirty-two people out of the 55 ultimately lost their benefits. We could also contend that people will be motivated to lie on their questionnaires because they need their welfare benefits, thus preventing them from getting the drug treatment they need and simply perpetuating the addiction problem. An ultimatum that says, you can stay on welfare, but you are going to have to follow some rules or you can get off of welfare and do what you please. Losing your job because of drug use can be the wake-up call you need.
Increases Safety Drug testing makes the workplace safer and increases employee confidence, according to testcountry. Buying the equipment and testing each and every individual in the program can be a bit costly. That is what this legislation provides. The goal of governments who provide these resources is to remove as much fraud as possible from the system. The state laws requiring drug tests for welfare recipients vary widely from state to state in their requirements.
The reports listing is sortable by the event date, report date, city, and state. Schott sees the trend toward proposing and passing these bills, which have come at a steady pace of one or two new ones each year for the last five or so, losing steam. Knowing a drug-testing system is in place generally helps employees be more productive because they do not have to fear a drug- or alcohol-related incident jeopardizing their welfare in any way. Why is a government-funded program recipient exempt? She is a proud veteran, wife and mother. Still others reason that since those who regularly work could be drug tested at any time due to their jobs, so those receiving welfare should have to undergo the same testing. The online site Welfare Information states that Welfare encompasses those government programs that provide benefits and economic assistance to no or low income individuals.
Opinion columnist Faith Alford is a journalism sophomore and may be reached at. The subject is in the news everyday with the political debates and the upcoming elections. When you are using drugs, you are distracted at best. In July 2011, Missouri governor Jay Nixon signed off on a similar drug screening bill in that state: Missouri Gov. Mags King, Growing up poor and being subjected to and having friends and family with mental illness and autoimmune diseases, I can wholeheartedly say I can feel your pain. Going off the assumption that those people are even stuck in an addiction, the time they gain from not using drugs can be put toward something useful or productive. Alcohol, marijuana, painkillers and other substances seriously impact judgment and reaction time.